Suppose I wish to solve the linear program $$\begin
$\begingroup$ You cannot use a strict inequality, as you won't have any minimizer (for any solution you claim, you can always create a slightly better). Hence, you have to settle for a strict inequality $x \geq 2016 + \epsilon$ where $\epsilon$ is a small number which you pick (based on what is strict enough for your application) $\endgroup$
Commented Nov 16, 2016 at 11:42 $\begingroup$ Is 2016.0000000000000000000000001 larger than 2016? What's your tolerance? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 21:29The standard form is sometimes defined with inequalities ($\leq$) and sometimes with equalities. If you want to begin with an algorithm it is useful to have equalities.
If all variables has to be equal or greater than $2016$ then you have to introduce slack variables like you proposed.
$x_1\geq 2016, x_2\geq 2016, x_3\geq 2016, \ldots, x_n\geq 2016$
$x_1-s_1= 2016, x_2-s_2= 2016, x_3-s_3= 2016, \ldots, x_n-s_n= 2016$
with $x_1, x_2,\dots, x_n, s_1, s_2, s_3, \ldots s_n \geq 0$
Here you get $n$ additional constraint. To get an initial solution artifitial variables have to be intoduced.
$x_1-s_1+a_1= 2016, x_2-s_2+a_2= 2016, x_3-s_3+a_3= 2016, \ldots, x_n-s_n+a_n= 2016$
with $x_1, x_2,\dots, x_n, s_1, s_2, s_3, \ldots s_n, a_1, a_2,\dots, a_n \geq 0$
The initial solution is $x_1=x_2=x_3=\ldots=x_n=s_1= s_2= s_3= \ldots s_n=0$
The decision variables are all non-negative.